Wednesday, August 24, 2016

 
2001 Westside Parkway, Suite 210 Alpharetta, GA 30004 • Telephone: Local: (770) 777-1868 Toll Free: (888) 545-6005 • Fax: (866) 543-2519

  
You are here   User Profile
My Profile
Profile Avatar
JustinPamela
*******
*******, ******* *******
*******
******* http://buyinstagramsfollowers.org/ *******

Quora Post Costs Applicant a Job; a New Ephemeral Messaging App

These days, courts are more and more frequently faced with disputes over whether, as part of the discovery process, best place to buy real instagram followers a litigant should be entitled to view the opposing party’s social media posts. As we’ve discussed, some courts deciding physical and emotional injury claims have held that the photos and status updates that the plaintiffs in those cases posted to Facebook were relevant to proving or disproving those claims. But are they always? A recent column in Slate points out that some judges and experts are questioning whether a person’s social media posts are adequate reflections of his or her emotional well-being. In one 2013 case over alleged disability discrimination—the plaintiff claimed her work supervisor mocked her after she told him she’d been diagnosed with adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder—a federal district court judge in New York held that “The fact that an individual may express some degree of joy, happiness, or sociability on certain occasions sheds little light on the issue of whether he or she is actually suffering emotional distress… For example, a severely depressed person may have a good day or several good days and choose to post about those days and avoid posting about moods more reflective of his or her actual emotional state.” We at Socially Aware tend to agree with this more skeptical view of the extent to which one’s “social” life reflects one’s real life. After all, if a woman can fake an entire vacation on Facebook, many of the platform’s users are likely posting status updates and pictures that are out of sync with their actual moods.
soical madia

The FTC Keeps Nomi Narrow, for Now. What Lessons Can Others Learn?

The proposed order provides for very narrow injunctive relief: It simply enjoins Nomi from misrepresenting how consumers can control the collection, use, disclosure or sharing of information collected from them or their devices, buy free instagram followers and from misrepresenting the extent to which consumers will receive notice about such tracking. The majority commissioners, in their statement, were at pains to disclaim any significance of the case with regard to the practice of retail tracking specifically,While the consent order does not require that Nomi provide in-store notice when a store uses its services or offer an in-store opt out, that was not the Commission’s goal in bringing this case. This case is simply about ensuring that when companies promise consumers the ability to make choices, they follow through on those promises.In other words, Nomi is the FTC’s first case involving brick-and-mortar tracking, but the FTC is not yet creating new law: The proposed order does not impose any affirmative notice and choice obligations on industry participants in the retail tracking space. It is not surprising that the commission declined to take such a drastic step with a practice that is still, relatively speaking, in its infancy, and that does not, on its face, involve sensitive personal information


Social Media provides businesses a unique opportunity to connect and engage with their current and potential client base at a hyperlocal level. Through social media channels, such as Facebook and Twitter, buy active followers on instagram Indianapolis-area companies can further relationship building and foster a positive online reputation. Our proprietary social media marketing platform takes care of end-to-end ad placement, strategy, and deployment. It establishes a radius around a business’ physical location, initially small, and then automatically expanding to deliver the maximum.everybody learns the adage that hard cases make bad law. When it comes to the Federal Trade Commission, a better aphorism might be, “easy cases make new law.” The FTC’s recent settlement with Nomi Technologies Inc. is, as the FTC’s press release notes, the “FTC’s first against a retail tracking company.” On its face, the case is like many FTC privacy cases: It challenges a statement in the company’s privacy policy for allegedly being inconsistent with the company’s actual practices and thus deceptive. Under the surface, however, the case may open the door for the FTC to create a notice-and-choice regime for the physical tracking of consumers, analogous to its well-established notice-and-choice regime for online tracking.